[Bug 145764] Re: doesn't state why updates are necessary
Robert Roth
evfool at gmail.com
Mon Aug 8 13:36:32 UTC 2011
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 89284 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89284
I'm marking this bug as a duplicate of bug #89284, as grouping updates by importance (security fixes, recommended updates, etc) is already implemented, as Sebastian has mentioned in comment 1, and the other part of this (same changelog/description for many updates) would be solved if updates would be grouped by their source package or by the application they do belong to, which is exactly what is requested in bug #89284.
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 89284
Group packages in the list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to update-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145764
Title:
doesn't state why updates are necessary
Status in “update-manager” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
Binary package hint: update-manager
The update manager doesn't state why updates are necessary. It just
lists a bunch of cryptic package names with some blurb about what the
package is for (which itself is usually cryptic, since you often see
5-6 packages for a single application or component of the desktop, and
all the package descriptions just say the same thing).
The update manager should at the very least state why updates are
available (are they security updates? bug fixes? new features? are
they critical?).
It would also be swell if the update manager would group related
packages together (with an expander to see all of the packages for the
silly pedantic people who have the time to waste) so instead of seeing
5 packages about Abiword updates, the user just sees that there is an
update to Abiword (as an example). The fact that Abiword is delivered
as multiple packages is an internal implementation detail of the
Debian packaging policy that is completely irrelevant to users (and
most developers) and it's just useless noise. I imagine that extra
meta-data might be necessary in packages to pull that part off
correctly.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/145764/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list