[Bug 420609] Re: wrong LC_TIME in Italian
Bug Watch Updater
420609 at bugs.launchpad.net
Wed May 25 16:44:58 UTC 2011
Launchpad has imported 19 comments from the remote bug at
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10425.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-07-21T12:42:08+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Accordingly to this file [1] and also because I'm Italian, I've seen
an error in the way the date is displayed in linux.
The correct formati for Italian speakers is:
day_name day_number month_name year HH:MM:SS
in the LC_TIME date_fmt things are really mixed up and should be changed to:
%a %e %b %Y, %H:%M:%S, %Z
[1]:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/globalization/locales/Italy-Italian_Date.pdf
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-07-21T14:07:08+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
popular Italian newspaper: http://www.corriere.it
the date is under the title "CORRIERE DELLA SERA", in the middle
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-07-21T15:39:38+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Created attachment 4070
italy.patch
possible patch, that swaps the fields. It does not add the "," since I don't
know if it must be added or not
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-19T12:56:44+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Is this the correct place, or should I ask in another bugzilla?
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-09-11T09:31:31+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
I'm sorry to ping you again, but I think this is an important and very simple
bug that can be fixed in 2 minutes, and a patch is present. It just needs your
attention
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-10-09T19:02:16+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Created attachment 4263
italian.patch
This is the correct format (note that : is now .)
updated patch accordingly.
"%a %e %b %Y, %H.%M.%S, %Z"
Now you just need to commit
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-10-17T07:42:01+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Is this bugzilla dead??
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/16
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-10-30T05:49:44+00:00 Drepper-fsp wrote:
I've added the changes.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-07-17T11:34:42+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Created attachment 4879
lc_time_italian.patch
New patch.
Just a question: what's the differnce betwen date_fmt and d_t_fmt?
Thanks!
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-21T15:05:53+00:00 Petr Baudis wrote:
What are you changing again and why with this new patch? Can you add a changelog
entry too?
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-21T22:08:05+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
I'll answer tomorrow, since I have to look back at the patch because I forgot
the changelog.
Can you tell me the difference from date_fmt and d_t_fmt?
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T09:54:53+00:00 Petr Baudis wrote:
Frankly, I have not been able to figure what date_fmt is good for quickly - its
purpose seems to be the same as d_fmt, but I cannot find it being used anywhere
within glibc...
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/27
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T10:32:08+00:00 Andreas Schwab wrote:
It's the default date(1) format.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/28
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T17:36:06+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
So there's no reason for them to be different, right?
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/29
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T19:14:48+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Created attachment 5001
lc_time_italian.patch
This patch contains the changelog, and drops the bits for it_CH since I'm from
Italy, not from Switzerland.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T19:15:24+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
reopening due to adding the changelog
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/31
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T19:17:30+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Created attachment 5002
lc_time_italian.patch
Sorry, I forgot to add a comment
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/32
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-24T20:39:20+00:00 Bugtrack wrote:
Nicolo,
different date and time formats are used depending from format :
% Appropriate date and time representation
date_fmt ...
% Appropriate date and time representation (%c) with abbreviations
d_t_fmt ...
% Appropriate date representation (%x)
d_fmt ...
% Appropriate time representation (%X)
t_fmt ...
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-25T08:05:09+00:00 Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Ok, so I will change date_fmt to not contain abbreviations.
What about the timezone? Should it be present for both date_fmt and d_fmt?
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/420609/comments/34
** Changed in: glibc
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
** Changed in: glibc
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420609
Title:
wrong LC_TIME in Italian
Status in The GNU C Library:
Confirmed
Status in “eglibc” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “glibc” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Bug description:
Accordingly to this file [1], this newspaper [2], and also because I'm Italian, there is an error in the way the date is displayed in linux.
The correct format for Italian speakers is:
day_name day_number month_name year, HH:MM:SS, time_zone
in the LC_TIME date_fmt things are really mixed up and should be changed to:
%a %e %b %Y, %H:%M:%S, %Z
the file localedata/locales/it_IT needs to be changed, but I can't
understand how, since there are only strange codes
[1]: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/globalization/locales/Italy-Italian_Date.pdf
[2]: http://www.corriere.it/
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list