[Bug 721531]
Rguenth
721531 at bugs.launchpad.net
Thu May 26 08:20:22 UTC 2011
There are several places in the compiler where we assume DECL_ALIGN
constraints the lower bits of the address of the DECL.
See several similar bugs in the past (PR47239 comes to my mind).
fold-const.c:get_pointer_modulus_and_residue looks suspicious to me here,
so you might want to try
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fold-const.c (revision 174266)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c (working copy)
@@ -9219,7 +9219,8 @@ get_pointer_modulus_and_residue (tree ex
*residue = 0;
code = TREE_CODE (expr);
- if (code == ADDR_EXPR)
+ if (code == ADDR_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)) != FUNCTION_DECL)
{
unsigned int bitalign;
bitalign = get_object_alignment_1 (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), residue);
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to gcc-4.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721531
Title:
[armel] gcc computes wrong address for main() at build time
Status in The GNU Compiler Collection:
New
Status in Linaro GCC:
Triaged
Status in “gcc-4.5” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in “gcc-4.5” source package in Natty:
Won't Fix
Status in “gcc-4.5” source package in Oneiric:
Triaged
Bug description:
Binary package hint: gcc-4.5
During the debugging of mono, we found a confirmed tool chain
regression and isolated it down to a testcase:
Test code:
void main() {
void *p = main;
if ((int)p & 1) printf ("HIT!\n");
}
Output:
mcasadevall at risingsun:~/tmp$ gcc -g test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:3:18: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'printf'
mcasadevall at risingsun:~/tmp$ ./a.out
HIT!
mcasadevall at risingsun:~/tmp$ gcc -g -O2 test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:3:18: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'printf'
mcasadevall at risingsun:~/tmp$ ./a.out
mcasadevall at risingsun:~/tmp$
Doesn't occur with gcc-4.4.
Additional comments from #monodev:
16:26:58 < vargaz> NCommander: it seems to think function addresses on arm
have their lowest bit set to 0, which is not true for
thumb.
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list