[Bug 538357] Re: package index files should be also compressed with lzma
Raphaël Hertzog
hertzog at debian.org
Sat Nov 26 13:54:17 UTC 2011
This is not a bug on dpkg. Reassigning to Ubuntu in general since I
don't know the proper place for such infrastructure request.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to dpkg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538357
Title:
package index files should be also compressed with lzma
Status in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Binary package hint: dpkg
Since apt already should support the lzma compression method ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/dpkg-lzma ) it would make sense to also compress the package index files which currently are compressed with bzip2 and gz.
For example: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/universe/binary-i386/
Even if the gain is only 10% (although it is often more especially
with -9) it might make a difference since this files are usually
downloaded every day. For a stable version the effect isn't that big
since only the update/security/backports files are updated and not
every day but with a slow connection it might have an effect since
they are downloaded in the background and might impact the user
experience.
Not to mention that lzma decompresses often more than twice as fast as bzip2.
http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks.html
For arm or platforms with low memory bzip2 or gz could be used.
(Btw. are there plans to make the package index files update
incremental)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/538357/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list