[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck
Jean-Pierre
838091 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sat Oct 15 06:55:39 UTC 2011
> But what should I do when I start my Oneiric and it bothers me with
> fsck.ntfs for my two windows partitions?
As there is no possible check, you should not request a check. Checks at
boot time are determined by the last field in /etc/fstab. <quote from
man fstab> : If the sixth field is not present or zero, a value of zero
is returned and fsck will assume that the filesystem does not need to
be checked </quote>
> I need a really solution.
There are two possibilities : either you avoid the check, or you find
someone volunteering to develop a checker for free.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to ntfs-3g in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838091
Title:
should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck
Status in “ntfs-3g” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
I've got a dualboot laptop, and the installer has created fstab
entries for the NTFS partitions. But now oneiric is complaining that
it can't mount them, and prompts me on boot what to do about it.
Skipping or ignoring the error makes the boot complete, and boot.log
reveals that it fails due to fsck.ntfs being missing.
So, ntfs-3g should symlink fsck.ntfs to ntfsfix or ntfsck, though the
latter fails to check my partitions, so maybe ntfsfix would be better.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/838091/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list