[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp "49710 days" old
Bug Watch Updater
43239 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sat Apr 21 18:07:10 UTC 2012
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Debian)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239
Title:
fsck should check against a timestamp "49710 days" old
Status in “e2fsprogs” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “util-linux” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “e2fsprogs” package in Debian:
Fix Released
Status in “util-linux” package in Debian:
Fix Released
Bug description:
If the system clock has been misadjusted while fsck last run, fsck
reports on next boot that the partition "has gone 49710 days without
being checked, check forced". Happens to me in Ubuntu after I do an
occasional boot to a parallel partition if fsck gets run there.
This is clearly nonsense. A quick google of "fsck 49710" gives out
numerous examples, revealing inter alia that 49710 days is close to
2^32 seconds, and gives a clear indication that fsck simply isn't
equipped to deal with a misconfigured system clock.
In such a case fsck should only run if the filesystem was actually
marked "dirty", i.e. not just because of the old timestamp. In
addition, fsck probably could fix the timestamp.
The problem is annoying. It often occurs for me when I try to debug
various system configuration issues (mainly X). Sometimes the system
hangs, leading to a hard boot, leading to fsck, often leading to the
further aggravation of unnecessary fsck checks due to a 136-year old
timestamp.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/43239/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list