[Bug 392204] Re: Huge CPU usage by mount.ntfs process

[jno]

Wrong, Sam.
If you were to create a new "really big" partition for use on a mobile rack or an USB-disk for data exchange with the "outer world", what would be your choice? I think, NTFS as the "common denominator" which is somehow understood by the most OSes (and, what might be even more important) "appliances" like media players (which have a linux on board, but cannot handle anything except of FAT/NTFS on drives attached to them).
Another case (well, my one) is a sorta "legacy" - NTFS disks which were moved from a windoze HTPC to an ubuntu NAS. Would you want me to re-format all those disks?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to ntfs-3g in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392204

Title:
  Huge CPU usage by mount.ntfs process

Status in NTFS-3G:
  New
Status in “ntfs-3g” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  While copying files from one ntfs partition to second ntfs partition
  process 'mount.ntfs' use 42 - 49% procesor resources (probably 100% on
  one core). Second 'mount.ntfs' process use 5% procesor time. (used
  'conky' for inspection)

  / and /home on first sata disk (ext4)
  file source on the second sata (ntfs)
  file target on third sata hdd (ntfs)

  Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 1 (up-to-date)

  Athlon 2xCore
  nvidia 570 chipset

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Jun 25 19:11:54 2009
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Package: nautilus 1:2.27.2-0ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.30-9.10-generic
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  Uname: Linux 2.6.30-9-generic i686

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntfs-3g/+bug/392204/+subscriptions