[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error
Paul Crawford
1001189 at bugs.launchpad.net
Fri May 18 20:20:26 UTC 2012
The id command shows:
$ id
uid=xxx05(opr) gid=xxx00(local) groups=xxx00(local),4(adm),20(dialout),109(lpadmin),501(operadores),502(vboxuser),xxx03(hrpt),xxx04(dosgroup),xxx07(vboxsf)
(with xxx replacing various numeric values that our sysadmin don't want
on a public forum)
The copy works without issue:
$ \cp --verbose /var/cache/man/index.db /dev/null
`/var/cache/man/index.db' -> `/dev/null'
Where 'cp' is normally aliased to 'cp -ip' so it squawks about /dev/null
existing, and that it can't preserve timestamps, hence the '\cp'.
The obvious permissions are fine, all users can read the file:
$ ls -l /var/cache/man/index.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 man root 634842 May 18 12:30 /var/cache/man/index.db
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to man-db in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001189
Title:
'man' command fails with lseek error
Status in “man-db” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
When trying to look up the on-line documentation using the 'man'
command it fails on 12.04 with lseek error. For example:
$ man resolvconf
gdbm fatal: lseek error
This lseek error applies to other requests as well (e.g. ls, fdisk,
etc). System information is:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release: 12.04
apt-cache policy man
man:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
However, it is installed since it runs as a command, and I find:
$ which man
/usr/bin/man
$ man --version
man 2.6.1
What I expect is to read the manual page appropriate to the
command/program, and not get a software error.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1001189/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list