[Bug 1001780] Re: apt-get update size is too big

zpletan 1001780 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sun May 20 18:44:56 UTC 2012


A look at
us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/$DIST/[main|universe]/binary-i386
reveals that timestamps on the package info for hardy, lucid, maverick,
natty, oneiric, and precise are being updated. Based on this, I would
say that the problem is *not* specific to Precise. This concurs with my
experience; in addition to real and virtual machines I have with
Precise, this happened on my virtual machine of Oneiric before I blew it
away a few weeks ago.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001780

Title:
  apt-get update size is too big

Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I ran a clean install to Ubuntu 12.04 and so far everything has been
  working well. I especially commend the Ubuntu team for this release.

  I only noticed that the size of repository update is now about ~13MB.
  Normally, it is about this size for the first time you run apt-get
  update after a clean install and then ~ 23kb - 1300kb for subsequent
  updates.  However now it looks like it gets 13MB and bigger every now
  and then.

  Using us.archive.ubuntu.com archive, I see that the Universe Package
  files are being recreated a couple of times an hour, but contain the
  same content. The file modification date and expiration date, and in
  particular, the etag, are changing each time causing apt-get update to
  reload the Package file again even though it hasn't changed.

  Launchpad shouldn't recreating the Package files when no changes have
  been made to the contained packages.

  #http://askubuntu.com/questions/135818/the-apt-get-update-cache-size-
  is-too-big

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1001780/+subscriptions




More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list