[Bug 1103187] Re: automatic updates tend to reboot and die into grub rescue
Péter Prőhle
1103187 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Jan 22 21:55:07 UTC 2013
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
No, this is an old install from October, and I update daily, but due to
a non-server grade SSD system disk, I choose in a dialog not to record
the history.
Due to the user friendly interface, I did not know, that this can switch
off the important system logs as well.
Concerning this particular bug, the upgrade log would be the most
essential piece of information.
I just wonder, why virtually nobody else reports this bug, when I suffer from it on 3 machines of really different booting systems. It is very unlikely that this bug depends on hardware or on installed packages or on anything.
Each day I'm scared, that a package will be automatically udated, and I
have to repair 3 installation.
Especially bad, if I have to repair my laptop in front of the gathering
audience, waiting for the late beginning of my university lecture, just
because the laptop sucked an update just before I left my office to go
to give a lecture. On the other hand, I do not wish to switch off the
automatic update. Just because of philosophy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to grub2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103187
Title:
automatic updates tend to reboot and die into grub rescue
Status in “grub2” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
On 3 essentially different Ubuntu 12.10 installations
bios or uefi boot,
linux is alone or other system is along,
legacy or guid partiton table
it is a regularly appearing issue since 12.10, that if the automatic
update touches a package which has some impact on the boot,
then the next reboot get stock at either the grub rescue prompt, or
booting the new kernel hangs at the missing initial ram disk, the
latter is typical after kernel update, even just after the virgin
installation of a fresh Ubuntu.
Grub rescue prompt is the much harder situation, I either type in the
correct grub commands to boot the previous kernel, or I use a "boot an
existing linux from a partition" menu of a SYSRESC pen drive.
Never really clear, what was wrong and what really helped.
Here is a list of my manual struggling and accidental solution
methods:
(1) Sometimes I do nothing, except for booting once more the system by
hand or by SYSRESC pen, and surprisingly the next time the system
boots, asif there was no kind of problem before. THIS happens more
frequently on the combination below, and less frequently on the other
2 combinations:
bios boot + other system along + legacy partition table
(2) More frequent in general is that remove/reinstall grub2, and/or
remove/reinstall new kernel, and/or simply grub-install and update-
grub helps, but usually NOT IN ONE STEP, however even after a logical
and defensive
grub-install /dev/sda
the situation likes to become worse, usually changes between the two
possibilities below:
"error: invalid arch-independant ELF magic."
"error: ELF header smaller than expected."
and naturally I have the grub rescue prompt. This time, just before
this error report, the solution appeared to be the
removal of memtest86+ and reinstall of it,
as first there was a normal grub menu, but memtest was missing from it
and the boot was unsuccessful, and after the usual kernel and grub
tampering I got the invalid arch-independant ELF magic, furter usual
tampering bought the ELF header smaller than expected, and finally my
desperate trial was the removal of the memtest against it's
dependencies, ... and it helped this time.
This kind of struggling is more frequent on the 2 combination below:
bios boot + linux alone + legacy partition table
uefi boot + linux alone + either legacy or guid partition
table (the both yields the error)
The latter uefi shows the problem most stable, even if I reinstall the
12.10 back to bios, from scratch.
I work with computers since 1972, and with linux 1994, but I still has
no firm idea which package is buggy.
My guess is that not the grub itself is buggy, but the other packages
have a buggy configuration relation to grub.
I suggest to rate this bug serious, if we take serious the #1 main
bug, see this site.
I spread linux among my students at the university since the 90's,
however if their system can become unavailable due to an automatic
update, then some of then will give up learning linux.
I understand that a usual other bug can be serious and hard. But if I
suggest the someone to switch to linux, and he/she can lost even the
booting opportunity, then it is scary for most of the average users,
and usually they have no enough skills to tackle the situtation, even
to rescue their own personal files back to a proprietary system.
That's why I suggest to rate this bug serious. Serious in the
consequencies in public relations.
The version of the all the packages I use are the most up to date due
to my policy to update as frequent as possible.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: grub2 (not installed)
Uname: Linux 3.2.34-std312-amd64 x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx raid1 raid0 multipath linear radeon r8169 mii usb_storage ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core wmi
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jan 22 21:28:32 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-19 (95 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: grub2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1103187/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list