[Bug 1153188]
Akiro
1153188 at bugs.launchpad.net
Fri Mar 22 03:17:32 UTC 2013
Well, "Urdu Nastaliq Unicode" seems added by Mandriva guy at
c26344ecfc1d3b85671f5d948a10d5cc27c21c2f. you may need to talk to him
about this change perhaps.
FWIW this is correct metadata for Urdu Nastaliq Unicode:
Pattern has 19 elts (size 32)
family: "Urdu Nastaliq Unicode"(s)
familylang: "en"(s)
style: "Regular"(s)
stylelang: "en"(s)
fullname: "Urdu Nastaliq Unicode"(s)
fullnamelang: "en"(s)
slant: 0(i)(s)
weight: 80(i)(s)
width: 100(i)(s)
foundry: "unknown"(s)
file: "/home/tagoh/Downloads/nastaliq_unicode.ttf"(s)
index: 0(i)(s)
outline: FcTrue(s)
scalable: FcTrue(s)
charset:
0000: 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff 7fffffff 00000000 00000000 00000000 00008000
0006: 88001000 07fffd86 0013cbff 420107ff 01020140 04008200 00341080 00000000
00fb: 00000000 00000000 03c00000 3c0003c0 c03c3f00 0000ffc0 01800000 f0000000
00fc: 00000000 08800000 20000000 00000000 00010003 00000000 00000080 00000800
00fd: 00000000 30000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00fe: 00000000 00000000 00000000 3fc30000 ffe7f807 ffffffff ffffffff 181867ff
(s)
lang: fj|ho|ia|ie|io|nr|om|so|ss|st|sw|ts|uz|xh|zu|kj|kwm|ms|ng|rn|rw|sn|za(s)
fontversion: 65536(i)(s)
fontformat: "TrueType"(s)
decorative: FcFalse(s)
and glyph coverage information is:
/home/tagoh/Downloads/nastaliq_unicode.ttf:0 Missing 5 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for ur language
0x0623
0x0624
0x0626
0x06be
0x06c3
For Nafees Nastaleeq:
Pattern has 20 elts (size 32)
family: "Nafees Nastaleeq"(s)
familylang: "en"(s)
style: "Regular"(s)
stylelang: "en"(s)
fullname: "Nafees"(s) "Nafees Nastaleeq"(s)
fullnamelang: "en"(s) "en"(s)
slant: 0(i)(s)
weight: 80(i)(s)
width: 100(i)(s)
foundry: "unknown"(s)
file: "/usr/share/fonts/nafees-nastaleeq/NafeesNastaleeq.ttf"(s)
index: 0(i)(s)
outline: FcTrue(s)
scalable: FcTrue(s)
charset:
0000: 00000000 ffffffbf f8000001 78000001 00000000 00000002 00000000 00000000
0006: 883ff00f 07fffdde 01dff976 42011c00 01020140 44008200 001c100e 03ff0000
0025: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00001000 00000000
00fd: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 2c040000
00fe: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 08000000
(s)
lang: ur|pa-pk|lah(s)
fontversion: 65667(i)(s)
capability: "otlayout:arab"(s)
fontformat: "TrueType"(s)
decorative: FcFalse(s)
The glyph coverage for Urdu looks like Nafees Nastaleeq is better than Urdu Nastaliq Unicode at least. though there seems a lot of fonts that support Urdu in the world, DajaVu, Kacst, Nafees, and PakType, and maybe more.
I can't figure out this is really better choice for Urdu and can't settle the kind of this issue so I'm always suggesting to have own recipes to give it a priority instead of changing the default font here because this is sort of subjective matter.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153188
Title:
Urdu with better support: Default Fonts, Kbd Layout
Status in Fontconfig - Font Configuration Library:
Confirmed
Status in “fontconfig” package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in “fonts-nafees” package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in “fonts-nafees” package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
Default fonts in Ubuntu show ugly Urdu text.
It's better that language-selector sets "Nafees Regular" (Nafees Web
in fonts-nafees package) as default font for all font families
(SansSerif, Serif...except mono) used in Ubuntu.
I would like to ask, if language-selector is able to set specific
keyboard layout for Urdu for 1st time?
Please Shabbir:
Could you write here the best setting for Urdu Fonts (Using "Tweak Tool": Scale Factor, Hinting, Anitaliasing, Size)?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/1153188/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list