[Bug 1234132] Re: Wrong order for mountall-net

[Steve Langasek]

And how are you configuring dnsmasq? If you are using the stock Ubuntu
desktop, you will have NetworkManager depending on the dnsmasq-base
package, and providing a dnsmasq server that guaranteeably starts before
NM signals mountall.  If you are using dnsmasq some other way - for
instance, by not providing any fallback DNS servers to resolvconf that
would be usable by the system between the time the network interface
comes up and the time dnsmasq starts - then sure, that's not going to
work.  But that's nota bug in mountall; mountall has no way of knowing
that the network isn't really up yet when it's supposed to be.  If
anything, that would be a bug in the dnsmasq package for not integrating
properly with mountall.

** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234132

Title:
  Wrong order for mountall-net

Status in “mountall” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  When using DNS resolving daemons like dnsmasq the mountall-net is done
  to early in the boot process when DNS is not available.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1234132/+subscriptions