[Bug 1241562] Re: package procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

luciopineda lucio.pineda at gmail.com
Thu Oct 24 08:21:30 UTC 2013


Il 23/10/2013 10:33, Ouilsen ha scritto:
> Here is a solution.
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1505356
It doesn't help me
>
> The problem is that you probably use a hoster that relies on a different
> kernel than ubuntu (custom 2.6.x build in my case). So you have to
> remove a kernel option in the ptrace upstart script in
> /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf, since your kernel does not support it.
> However, this does not seem to be recommended. So I am getting in touch
> with my hoster.
This is my

/etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf

lucio at lucio-N61PA-M2S:/etc/sysctl.d$ cat 10-ptrace.conf
# The PTRACE system is used for debugging.  With it, a single user process
# can attach to any other dumpable process owned by the same user.  In the
# case of malicious software, it is possible to use PTRACE to access
# credentials that exist in memory (re-using existing SSH connections,
# extracting GPG agent information, etc).
#
# A PTRACE scope of "0" is the more permissive mode.  A scope of "1" limits
# PTRACE only to direct child processes (e.g. "gdb name-of-program" and
# "strace -f name-of-program" work, but gdb's "attach" and "strace -fp $PID"
# do not).  The PTRACE scope is ignored when a user has CAP_SYS_PTRACE, so
# "sudo strace -fp $PID" will work as before.  For more details see:
# https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap/KernelHardening#ptrace
#
# For applications launching crash handlers that need PTRACE, exceptions can
# be registered by the debugee by declaring in the segfault handler
# specifically which process will be using PTRACE on the debugee:
#   prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, debugger_pid, 0, 0, 0);
#
# In general, PTRACE is not needed for the average running Ubuntu system.
# To that end, the default is to set the PTRACE scope to "1". This value
# may not be appropriate for developers or servers with only admin accounts.
kernel.yama.ptrace_scope = 1
lucio at lucio-N61PA-M2S:/etc/sysctl.d$

> But I don't know what to do
Many Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241562

Title:
  package procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: il
  sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo
  stato di errore 1

Status in “procps” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After apt-get update and than apt-get upgrade I've the following report from shell
  Continuare [S/n]? s
  Configurazione di procps (1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1)...
  start: Job failed to start
  invoke-rc.d: initscript procps, action "start" failed.
  dpkg: errore nell'elaborare procps (--configure):
   il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
  Si sono verificati degli errori nell'elaborazione:
   procps
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-54.82-generic-pae 3.2.50
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-54-generic-pae i686
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.5
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Fri Oct 18 09:09:32 2013
  DuplicateSignature: package:procps:1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1:il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
  ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: procps
  Title: package procps 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1241562/+subscriptions



More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list