[Bug 1216470] Re: ntfs-3g Raring package does not indicate that it provides ntfsprogs

[Rolf Leggewie]

saucy has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the saucy task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".

** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Saucy)
       Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to gparted in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216470

Title:
  ntfs-3g Raring package does not indicate that it provides ntfsprogs

Status in fai package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fsarchiver package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gparted package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-lts-trusty package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ntfs-3g package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in partitionmanager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fai source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in fsarchiver source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in gparted source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in linux-lts-trusty source package in Raring:
  Won't Fix
Status in ntfs-3g source package in Raring:
  Won't Fix
Status in partitionmanager source package in Raring:
  Invalid
Status in fai source package in Saucy:
  Invalid
Status in fsarchiver source package in Saucy:
  Invalid
Status in gparted source package in Saucy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-lts-trusty source package in Saucy:
  Won't Fix
Status in ntfs-3g source package in Saucy:
  Won't Fix
Status in partitionmanager source package in Saucy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  When installing third-party packages that depend on ntfsprogs and
  support multiple Ubuntu versions, the dependency check fails on Raring
  Ringtail since the ntfs-3g package does not indicate it replaces
  ntfsprogs (source: aptitude show ntfs-3g).  I suspect this was
  overlooked in Raring as ntfsprogs was dropped (not provided) in
  Raring.  Unfortunately, some third-party packages will still address
  ntfsprogs for sometime and it would be helpful if ntfs-3g would
  satisfy the dependency.

  I have filed a bug with the third-party provider as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fai/+bug/1216470/+subscriptions