[Bug 1289501] Re: pkg-config broken on saucy (only) -pthread for both --libs and --cflags of check.pc are missing

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package check - 0.9.10-4ubuntu1.1

---------------
check (0.9.10-4ubuntu1.1) saucy-proposed; urgency=low

  * add -pthread to --libs of check.pc (LP: #1289501)
 -- Scott Kitterman <scott at kitterman.com>   Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:51:32 -0500

** Changed in: check (Ubuntu Saucy)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to check in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289501

Title:
  pkg-config broken on saucy (only) -pthread for both --libs and
  --cflags of check.pc are missing

Status in “check” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “check” source package in Saucy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  This is already fixed via Debian in Trusty:

  check (0.9.10-6) unstable; urgency=low

    * add -pthread to both --libs and --cflags of check.pc (sigh)

   -- Robert Lemmen <robertle at semistable.com>  Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:10:47
  +0000

  This causes incorrect linking in saucy.  See
  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/168496724/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-
  amd64.clamav_0.98.1%2Bdfsg-2ubuntu1~13.10~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
  for an example.  This package builds fine on precise, quantal, and
  trusty.

  From the build logs:
  Saucy:
  configure: Summary of miscellaneous  features
                check       : -lcheck_pic -lrt -lm
  Trusty:
  configure: Summary of miscellaneous  features
                check       : -pthread -lcheck_pic -lrt -lm

  The fix is to SRU the -6 change into Saucy.

  [Impact]

   * Some packages will fail to build.  Since not all packages were
  rebuilt after the new (broken) check version landed during Saucy
  development, there may be, in addition to PPA packages like the
  example, archive packages when cannot be built for security updates,
  SRU, etc.

  [Test Case]

   * See the above build log for reproduction.

   * Once the new check package is in -proposed, i'll add -proposed to
  the PPA and retry.  If it builds, win.

  [Regression Potential]

   * Regression potential is negligible.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: check (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Fri Mar  7 12:22:39 2014
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-04-04 (1067 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Beta i386 (20110330)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: check
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-16 (142 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/check/+bug/1289501/+subscriptions