[Bug 513644] Re: Does not log fsck invocations in /var/log/fsck/
Daniel Richard G.
skunk at iskunk.org
Thu May 15 23:36:12 UTC 2014
Marcelo: You could make /sbin/fsck a shell script that wraps the real
fsck binary, and logs the output as desired. Doing this with a dpkg
diversion might even keep things from breaking when the util-linux
package is upgraded....
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513644
Title:
Does not log fsck invocations in /var/log/fsck/
Status in “mountall” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
Binary package hint: mountall
This concerns mountall 1.0 in Karmic.
After fsck is invoked at boot time, the two log files in
/var/log/fsck/ remain empty. In Jaunty, the
/etc/init.d/check{fs,root}.sh scripts saved the output of the commands
to that directory ("A log is being saved in ${FSCK_LOGFILE} if that
location is writable") but mountall has yet to do this.
As this would have to be newly implemented, I'd like to request a
slight change from the Jaunty behavior, and have entries be appended
to the log files rather than the files being overwritten each time
with the latest (single) entry. Log rotation on these files may be
good, too, although I'm not sure which package would/should be
responsible for that.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/513644/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list