[Bug 1522004] Re: [MIR] s390-netdevice

[Didier Roche]

"[Standards compliance]
Yes... well not sure about binary postinst."
-> Yeah, I'm not fan either about that solution. Can't we achieve this more elegantly via a dpkg trigger? That way, we wouldn't fail the whole transition in case we can't compile the module.

Also, I think the package should dep on gcc or any involved compiler?

Finally, there is no obvious copyright of the file not in debian/ directory. We need to either:
- have one GPL2 header into that file (and then, we have an obvious "upstream" copyright
- ship a COPYING or LICENSE file.

** Changed in: s390-netdevice (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to s390-netdevice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522004

Title:
  [MIR] s390-netdevice

Status in s390-netdevice package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Availability]
  To be available on s390x

  [Rationale]
  d-i component binary to discover and activate network hardware

  [Security]
  single postinst compiled binary

  [Quality assurance]
  Good.

  Well, it's a C binary compiled into `postinst` which might be
  confusing, as otherwise the package is "empty".

  [Dependencies]
  s390-sysconfig-writer bug #1522002

  [Standards compliance]
  Yes... well not sure about binary postinst.

  [Maintenance]
  Foundations & xnox

  [Background information]
  d-i component binary to discover and activate network hardware for s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-netdevice/+bug/1522004/+subscriptions