[Bug 1643084] Re: [REGRESSION] kill segfaults w/ single, negative PID

Brian Murray brian at ubuntu.com
Mon Nov 21 17:53:18 UTC 2016


Hello dann, or anyone else affected,

Accepted procps into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Xenial)
       Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643084

Title:
  [REGRESSION] kill segfaults w/ single, negative PID

Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in procps source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The kill binary will segfault when called w/ a single, negative PID. This breaks a use case where you maybe sending the default signal (SIGTERM) to all processes (-1) or all processes in a process group (-<PGID). This is regression introduced via an SRU to fix LP: #1637026.

  [Test Case]
  $ /bin/kill -9
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  [Regression Risk]
  This fix will now make our optparsing almost identical to current yakkety, for which I see no obvious regressions filed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1643084/+subscriptions



More information about the foundations-bugs mailing list