[Bug 620428] Re: unixodbc-dev: 64bit typedefs don't work

[Bug Watch Updater]

Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518623.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-21T10:59:18+00:00 Caolan wrote:

Created attachment 358225
get the defines into the headers

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
#include <sqltypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
        fprintf(stderr, "size is %d\n", sizeof(SQLBIGINT));
        return 0;
}
  
Actual results:
size is 4

Expected results:
I strongly suspect it should be 8

Additional info:
This comes about because /usr/include/unixodbc_conf_platform.h has just
#define ODBCINT64
which comes from odbc_config --header, it should be
#define ODBCINT64 "something"

A fix attached, which is basically derived from head unixODBC cvs. Quite
possibly technically anything that built against our unixODBC headers is
busted.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-21T13:52:24+00:00 Caolan wrote:

yeah, should be 8 not 4.

back in F-10 with unixODBC-2.2.12-9.fc10 we get 8
unix-ODBC-2.2.11 on debian gives 8

so it just looks like unixODBC-2.2.14 in F-11/rawhide that gives the
incorrect 4

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-21T19:05:30+00:00 Tom wrote:

Hmm.  Anything that mentioned ODBCINT64 directly would probably fail to
compile, but it seems like gcc doesn't object to "typedef SQLBIGINT;"
and treats it as implicitly int.  So code referencing SQLBIGINT or
SQLUBIGINT is at risk.

I will fix this in HEAD ... I am not sure if it's bright to back-patch
into F-11, but on the other hand it's unlikely that could make things
worse.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-21T21:11:10+00:00 Fedora wrote:

unixODBC-2.2.14-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unixODBC-2.2.14-6.fc11

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-21T21:13:34+00:00 Tom wrote:

Fix pushed into rawhide, also in F-11 testing.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-25T04:30:15+00:00 Fedora wrote:

unixODBC-2.2.14-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unixODBC'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8919

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-10-21T23:06:57+00:00 Jesse wrote:

This has been fixed for F12, dropping it from the blocker.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-11-16T11:35:31+00:00 Bug wrote:


This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-08T10:05:33+00:00 Caolan wrote:

lets mark this as closed, as fixed since F-12

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/comments/8


** Changed in: unixodbc (Fedora)
       Status: Unknown => Fix Released

** Changed in: unixodbc (Fedora)
   Importance: Unknown => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to unixodbc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620428

Title:
  unixodbc-dev: 64bit typedefs don't work

Status in unixodbc package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unixodbc package in Debian:
  Fix Released
Status in unixodbc package in Fedora:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: unixodbc

  see the debian report.

  patch from the fedora report.

    * Fix output of odbc_config --header, per Fedora bug #518623.
      This error results in SQLBIGINT and SQLUBIGINT being misdefined as
      int, where they need to be [unsigned] long or long long.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unixodbc/+bug/620428/+subscriptions