[Bug 1018373] Re: documentation describes non-included ProcCmdline field
Launchpad Bug Tracker
1018373 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue May 5 05:44:56 UTC 2020
[Expired for apport (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018373
Title:
documentation describes non-included ProcCmdline field
Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
Expired
Bug description:
The documentation, in the "Process specific data fields" section,
describes a required ProcCmdline field:
doc/data-format.tex; line 209:
\item [ProcCmdline:] (required) Contents of \verb!/proc/pid/cmdline!
but according to the changelog, this field is not included in bug
reports since 2008-02-06:
2008-02-06 Martin Pitt <martin.pitt at ubuntu.com>
...
* apport/ui.py,
* debian/changelog: [1048] * apport/ui.py: Do not include ProcCmdline
in bug reports, since these are not ack'ed by the user and might
contain sensitive data. (LP: #132800)
The field is still used internally for restarting the process, but
isn't included in the bug reports, and mention of the required
ProcCmdline field should be removed.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1018373/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list