[Bug 1976257] [NEW] sbuild breaks lp-buildd with symlinks to .dsc files
Dave Jones
1976257 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon May 30 12:40:03 UTC 2022
Public bug reported:
We're currently carrying a delta in our sbuild which reverts a commit in
the upstream [1] which purports to fix a bug [2]. There's no bug
associated with this delta, which allegedly fixes a build failure in lp-
buildd. The delta in question is documented under d/p/abs-path-
revert.patch (I say "documented" as sbuild is a native package, so the
patch itself does nothing more than document the delta that exists in
the base tar-ball), and contains:
--- a/bin/sbuild
+++ b/bin/sbuild
@@ -84,10 +84,6 @@ sub main () {
my $jobname = $ARGV[0];
my $source_dir = 0;
- if (-e $jobname) {
- $jobname = abs_path($jobname);
- }
-
if (-d $jobname) {
$jobname = create_source_package($jobname);
if ($jobname eq '.') {
@@ -171,6 +167,7 @@ sub main () {
sub create_source_package ($) {
my $dsc = shift;
+ $dsc = abs_path($dsc);
open(my $pipe, '-|', 'dpkg-parsechangelog',
'-l' . $dsc . '/debian/changelog')
Despite digging around the bug and code history of lp-buildd around the
time the sbuild patch was introduced, I've come up empty for additional
information on why this change was introduced. As requested in the merge
LP: #1974177, I'm filing this bug largely to try and track whether this
delta is still required.
We could simply remove the patch and "see what happens" but I'm
reluctant to do that given the potentially wide-ranging breakage that
could result. Ideally, this needs some more in-depth investigation by
someone either more familiar with lp-buildd, or the time to set up a
local test environment to determine whether we should still be carrying
this patch.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/commit/d15d5ea67b81cde811207ff6853b381c3ebe4b41
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801436
** Affects: sbuild (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to sbuild in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976257
Title:
sbuild breaks lp-buildd with symlinks to .dsc files
Status in sbuild package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
We're currently carrying a delta in our sbuild which reverts a commit
in the upstream [1] which purports to fix a bug [2]. There's no bug
associated with this delta, which allegedly fixes a build failure in
lp-buildd. The delta in question is documented under d/p/abs-path-
revert.patch (I say "documented" as sbuild is a native package, so the
patch itself does nothing more than document the delta that exists in
the base tar-ball), and contains:
--- a/bin/sbuild
+++ b/bin/sbuild
@@ -84,10 +84,6 @@ sub main () {
my $jobname = $ARGV[0];
my $source_dir = 0;
- if (-e $jobname) {
- $jobname = abs_path($jobname);
- }
-
if (-d $jobname) {
$jobname = create_source_package($jobname);
if ($jobname eq '.') {
@@ -171,6 +167,7 @@ sub main () {
sub create_source_package ($) {
my $dsc = shift;
+ $dsc = abs_path($dsc);
open(my $pipe, '-|', 'dpkg-parsechangelog',
'-l' . $dsc . '/debian/changelog')
Despite digging around the bug and code history of lp-buildd around
the time the sbuild patch was introduced, I've come up empty for
additional information on why this change was introduced. As requested
in the merge LP: #1974177, I'm filing this bug largely to try and
track whether this delta is still required.
We could simply remove the patch and "see what happens" but I'm
reluctant to do that given the potentially wide-ranging breakage that
could result. Ideally, this needs some more in-depth investigation by
someone either more familiar with lp-buildd, or the time to set up a
local test environment to determine whether we should still be
carrying this patch.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sbuild/-/commit/d15d5ea67b81cde811207ff6853b381c3ebe4b41
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801436
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild/+bug/1976257/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list