[Bug 1998265] Re: OverFlow error when using cnf-extractor
Robie Basak
1998265 at bugs.launchpad.net
Wed Jan 11 21:01:55 UTC 2023
Since the SRU team -approved Test Plan was to rely on autopkgtest, and
autopkgtests are showing all passed, we can consider this bug verified
for those releases.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-kinetic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-done-jammy verification-done-kinetic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998265
Title:
OverFlow error when using cnf-extractor
Status in python-apt package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in python-apt source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in python-apt source package in Focal:
Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Jammy:
Fix Committed
Status in python-apt source package in Kinetic:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
[Impact]
Large files can't be downloaded as we use a 32-bit integer in AcquireFile constructor, this breaks e.g. command-not-found generator:
I'm trying to update the command-not-found indexes (bin/cnf-extract.py
$MIRROR $suite $component $arch) on the production cnf extractor
system (running bionic) and have encountered Tracebacks when
generating them for Jammy and Lunar. This is causing the command not
found indexes to be out of date for all(?) releases of Ubuntu.
The lunar failure:
Get:1 dotnet-sdk-6.0_6.0.111-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb [79.1 MB]
Fetched 79.1 MB in 0s (0 B/s)
Traceback (most recent call last):64... 7%
File "./bin/cnf-extract.py", line 54, in <module>
mirror_root, suite, component, arch)
File "/srv/cnf-extractor/extractor/extractor.py", line 174, in command_not_found_extract
debpath = pkg.candidate.fetch_binary(destdir=tmpdir)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/package.py", line 883, in fetch_binary
self.size, base, destfile=destfile)
OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum
I'll get more context for the Jammy failure but it wouldn't surprise
me if it was the same package.
[Test plan]
I have included a test for the AcquireFile constructor to accept a large file size, and then a test that ensures it can read the file size.
Run the autopkgtest suite.
[Where problems could occur]
It could fail in other places now.
For kinetic, the package was copied in from lunar without changes.
This upload is actually built in kinetic and hence there is additional
regression potential from toolchain changes.
[Other info]
Also including some auxiliary changes as we move back to proper upstream releases to enable testing, mostly around
d/gbp.conf, .gitlab-ci.yml - being updated to point at right places
d/t/control - adding a missing test dependency
data/ - updated mirror lists
The mirror lists are standard updates; the debian/tests/control change
is needed to enable testing on more minimal autopkgtest images (our images
accidentally include binutils); the other changes have zero impact on the Ubuntu infra or end user side as they only run during development.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-apt/+bug/1998265/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list