[Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files
Timo Aaltonen
2064360 at bugs.launchpad.net
Fri May 3 06:56:59 UTC 2024
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pam into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/1.5.3-5ubuntu5.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance for helping!
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064360
Title:
libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files
Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in pam source package in Noble:
Fix Committed
Status in pam package in Debian:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[ Impact ]
* In the pam 1.5.3-1 merge, documents formerly found in libpam-doc
were omitted. Just a few documents remain in a package that
formerly had many in /usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/{html,txt}.
* A debdiff of the dropped files can be found in attachment
1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff
* The fix takes the form of correcting a build dependency, which
results in the docs being again available.
[ Test Plan ]
* debdiff
* Obtain a copy of the current pam binary packages, perhaps with
`pull-lp-debs libpam-doc 1.5.3-5ubuntu5`
* Obtain a copy of the proposed pam binary packages, perhaps with
`pull-lp-debs libpam-doc 1.5.3-5ubuntu5.1`
* `debdiff libpam-doc_1.5.3-5ubuntu5{,.1}_all.deb`
and verify that the documents are present
* upgrade
* Obtain a mantic test system - I personally used a mantic chroot
* `apt install libpam-doc doc-base`
* Adjust apt sources to change mantic to noble and ensure
noble-proposed is present
* `apt update; apt install libpam-doc/noble-proposed`
* Verify that the "Error in /usr/share/doc-base" messages are no
longer present
[ Where problems could occur ]
* As usual, no SRU has zero risk
* Any change to pam risks problems in user logins failing, so that is
reflected in the regression test plan on LP: #2064350
[ Other Info ]
* None at this time
original description follows:
---
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1065064:
Package: libpam-doc
Version: 1.5.3-4
Severity: normal
An upgrade reported:
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libpam-doc.pam-admin-guide', line 14: all `Format' sections are invalid.
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libpam-doc.pam-applications-guide', line 17: all `Format' sections are invalid.
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libpam-doc.pam-modules-guide', line 14: all `Format' sections are invalid.
This is true; all of /usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/html/Linux-PAM_SAG.html,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/html/sag-*.html,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/txt/Linux-PAM_SAG.txt.gz,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/html/Linux-PAM_ADG.html,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/html/adg*.html,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/txt/Linux-PAM_ADG.txt.gz,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/html/Linux-PAM_MWG.html,
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/html/mwg*.html, and
/usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/txt/Linux-PAM_MWG.txt.gz are listed in those
doc-base files but are in fact missing. I don't know whether this is
intentional (in which case the doc-base registrations should be removed
to match), or an accidental build issue that should be fixed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.6.0-14-generic (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect
-- no debconf information
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwatson at debian.org]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2064360/+subscriptions
More information about the foundations-bugs
mailing list