[Bug 2119049] Re: [SRU] Handle rename of u-boot-amlogic as part of noble backport

[Dave Jones]

** Description changed:

+ [ Test Plan ]
+ 
+ For each affected series:
+ 
+ * Under an Ubuntu arm-based image, install u-boot-amlogic from an older version (<2025)
+ * Run upgrade to proposed version
+ * Ensure upgrade pulls in u-boot-amlogic-binaries
+ 
+ * Under an Ubuntu noble arm-based image, install a pre-2024 version
+ * dist-upgrade to a later release
+ * Ensure dist-upgrade also pulls in u-boot-amlogic-binaries package automatically
+ 
+ Note: we don't require the board used for this to actually use u-boot-
+ amlogic; this is not testing the bootloader function just the package
+ rename
+ 
+ [ Where things could go wrong ]
+ 
+ The bootloader functionality is not under consideration with this change
+ as we don't have any boards that actually use this package any more. The
+ only question is whether both upgrade and dist-upgrade will implicitly
+ migrate the u-boot-amlogic package to u-boot-amlogic-binaries.
+ 
+ If it does not, the best case scenario is either that no (extant) boards
+ still use this package, or that they continue booting because (for
+ example) the bootloader itself is only flashed manually. The worst case
+ scenario is this leaves anyone relying on this package with a broken
+ boot (assuming whatever is flashing boot assets will flash them
+ automatically, even when the bootloader is missing).
+ 
+ [ Original Description ]
+ 
  During the backport of 2025.01 to noble (to mitigate the movement to
  RVA23 as part of questing) (LP: #2110301), the SRU team noted that
  u-boot-amlogic has been replaced by u-boot-amlogic-binaries, and that
  the effective renaming of this package should have an empty transitional
  package and "Provides" clause to comply with renaming practices [1].
  This change is also required in the plucky and questing releases.
  
  [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition case 5

** Description changed:

+ [ Impact ]
+ 
+ See where things could go wrong section for full description; somewhere
+ between "nothing" and "broken boot".
+ 
  [ Test Plan ]
  
  For each affected series:
  
  * Under an Ubuntu arm-based image, install u-boot-amlogic from an older version (<2025)
  * Run upgrade to proposed version
  * Ensure upgrade pulls in u-boot-amlogic-binaries
  
  * Under an Ubuntu noble arm-based image, install a pre-2024 version
  * dist-upgrade to a later release
  * Ensure dist-upgrade also pulls in u-boot-amlogic-binaries package automatically
  
  Note: we don't require the board used for this to actually use u-boot-
  amlogic; this is not testing the bootloader function just the package
  rename
  
  [ Where things could go wrong ]
  
  The bootloader functionality is not under consideration with this change
  as we don't have any boards that actually use this package any more. The
  only question is whether both upgrade and dist-upgrade will implicitly
  migrate the u-boot-amlogic package to u-boot-amlogic-binaries.
  
  If it does not, the best case scenario is either that no (extant) boards
  still use this package, or that they continue booting because (for
  example) the bootloader itself is only flashed manually. The worst case
  scenario is this leaves anyone relying on this package with a broken
  boot (assuming whatever is flashing boot assets will flash them
  automatically, even when the bootloader is missing).
  
  [ Original Description ]
  
  During the backport of 2025.01 to noble (to mitigate the movement to
  RVA23 as part of questing) (LP: #2110301), the SRU team noted that
  u-boot-amlogic has been replaced by u-boot-amlogic-binaries, and that
  the effective renaming of this package should have an empty transitional
  package and "Provides" clause to comply with renaming practices [1].
  This change is also required in the plucky and questing releases.
  
  [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition case 5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to u-boot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119049

Title:
  [SRU] Handle rename of u-boot-amlogic as part of noble backport

Status in u-boot package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in u-boot source package in Plucky:
  Triaged
Status in u-boot source package in Questing:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  See where things could go wrong section for full description;
  somewhere between "nothing" and "broken boot".

  [ Test Plan ]

  For each affected series:

  * Under an Ubuntu arm-based image, install u-boot-amlogic from an older version (<2025)
  * Run upgrade to proposed version
  * Ensure upgrade pulls in u-boot-amlogic-binaries

  * Under an Ubuntu noble arm-based image, install a pre-2024 version
  * dist-upgrade to a later release
  * Ensure dist-upgrade also pulls in u-boot-amlogic-binaries package automatically

  Note: we don't require the board used for this to actually use u-boot-
  amlogic; this is not testing the bootloader function just the package
  rename

  [ Where things could go wrong ]

  The bootloader functionality is not under consideration with this
  change as we don't have any boards that actually use this package any
  more. The only question is whether both upgrade and dist-upgrade will
  implicitly migrate the u-boot-amlogic package to u-boot-amlogic-
  binaries.

  If it does not, the best case scenario is either that no (extant)
  boards still use this package, or that they continue booting because
  (for example) the bootloader itself is only flashed manually. The
  worst case scenario is this leaves anyone relying on this package with
  a broken boot (assuming whatever is flashing boot assets will flash
  them automatically, even when the bootloader is missing).

  [ Original Description ]

  During the backport of 2025.01 to noble (to mitigate the movement to
  RVA23 as part of questing) (LP: #2110301), the SRU team noted that
  u-boot-amlogic has been replaced by u-boot-amlogic-binaries, and that
  the effective renaming of this package should have an empty
  transitional package and "Provides" clause to comply with renaming
  practices [1]. This change is also required in the plucky and questing
  releases.

  [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition case 5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/2119049/+subscriptions