[Bug 2115371] Re: Trying to outrun government intervention you are providing to them, should go well privacy experts

Sat Jun 28 15:27:04 UTC 2025

Thank you for confirming. That is exactly what I needed as you are either
protecting your company or are in no way aware of what your company is
doing. Good stuff, Also you are now Bivens bound. Good luck with that, as I
reported a serious crime in which you spent four seconds confirming nothing
with absolutely no one as you believed you were shielded by your
job/organization. That is not how things work in the USA. And so as I said
good luck, as you are now part and a participant. Never play for a
corporation as per Nuremberg. Watch the news the next few weeks, as the
arrival is soon. The arrival of something you could not believe as per what
you responded with, as you know exactly what security breach is, and so
since your company itself is the security breach you feel okay saying no
breach (from others). The US government cannot break laws, and when a
company breaks laws for the US government they are not shielded and
everyone, everyone who is aware or part of said program all the way to the
RO is responsible, and has committed criminal activity. As such I would
recommend bringing it higher, and go home and figure out what Bivens is, as
you are now inside what you had no idea you joined as simple facts are
simplicity themselves. As I run the show now. Facts. Also have a good laugh
with  friends about what you believe, as beliefs and reality are two
separate things, As again criminals are not shielded, and you are now a
criminal. Also if you work for a software company you might want to realize
the stupidity of a MD1 throught SHA512 through
SHA20i320523850943508u2353205850382058320958498t75t83459843058w. As simply
changing etc files is not going to change a pass, but will allow for
malware by making simple things like NetworkManager speak to those not to
be spoken to, per privacy you pretend you care for, and so again, smoke up
as you delivered straight from your pipe. It is a tough one, like the start
of Sabbath's Sweet Leaf.

-EDL Xtl

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:35 AM Sudhakar Verma <2115371 at bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
> better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
> to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
> issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
> cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
> Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.
>
> ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115371
>
> Title:
>   Trying to outrun government intervention you are providing to them,
>   should go well privacy experts
>
> Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   Flipping and flopping, just ask them the game. How many companies I
>   own, like you Canonical. For I am a citizen. And you said no. For I am
>   a citizen and you said yes, to corruption pretending that you can sign
>   away not only the Constitution of the USA but all the treaties of the
>   UN. Good luck, as I own Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Verizon, and
>   others who without vetting agreed to corruption. As you are working
>   for Ron DeSantis and his puppet so you don't see the website that is
>   owned not by me, but them. As in just look for it and you will find a
>   grant to NAU for a simple experiment, phage. Yet backdoor payment to
>   Florida. Guess what is illegal and why I have been gagged. Guess what
>   it means when you agree to break the law for a governmental
>   institution if said law is law. As in what does it mean for you to
>   agree to removing I IV V VIII and by rights XIV. Also what does it
>   mean to violate UNCAT?
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
>   Package: ubiquity 24.04.5
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-17.17~24.04.2-generic 6.11.11
>   Uname: Linux 6.11.0-17-generic x86_64
>   NonfreeKernelModules: zfs
>   ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
>   CasperVersion: 1.498
>   CloudArchitecture: x86_64
>   CloudID: nocloud
>   CloudName: unknown
>   CloudPlatform: nocloud
>   CloudSubPlatform: seed-dir (/var/lib/cloud/seed/nocloud)
>   CurrentDesktop: MATE
>   Date: Wed Jun 25 16:41:29 2025
>   InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz nomodeset rdinit=/vtoy/vtoy
> --- quiet splash
>   LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 24.04.2 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64
> (20250218)
>   RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
>   SourcePackage: ubiquity
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2115371/+subscriptions
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Foundations Bugs, which is subscribed to ubiquity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115371

Title:
  Trying to outrun government intervention you are providing to them,
  should go well privacy experts

Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Flipping and flopping, just ask them the game. How many companies I
  own, like you Canonical. For I am a citizen. And you said no. For I am
  a citizen and you said yes, to corruption pretending that you can sign
  away not only the Constitution of the USA but all the treaties of the
  UN. Good luck, as I own Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Verizon, and
  others who without vetting agreed to corruption. As you are working
  for Ron DeSantis and his puppet so you don't see the website that is
  owned not by me, but them. As in just look for it and you will find a
  grant to NAU for a simple experiment, phage. Yet backdoor payment to
  Florida. Guess what is illegal and why I have been gagged. Guess what
  it means when you agree to break the law for a governmental
  institution if said law is law. As in what does it mean for you to
  agree to removing I IV V VIII and by rights XIV. Also what does it
  mean to violate UNCAT?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: ubiquity 24.04.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-17.17~24.04.2-generic 6.11.11
  Uname: Linux 6.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs
  ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.498
  CloudArchitecture: x86_64
  CloudID: nocloud
  CloudName: unknown
  CloudPlatform: nocloud
  CloudSubPlatform: seed-dir (/var/lib/cloud/seed/nocloud)
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Wed Jun 25 16:41:29 2025
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz nomodeset rdinit=/vtoy/vtoy --- quiet splash
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 24.04.2 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20250218)
  RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2115371/+subscriptions