[PATCH] cpu: cpufreq: Make this test no longer experimental.
Keng-Yu Lin
kengyu at canonical.com
Wed Dec 12 02:59:55 UTC 2012
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Colin King <colin.king at canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> This test was recently fixed by Ivan and I now deem it working
> well enough to no longer be an experimental test. If we see
> errors with this test we can either fix them or make this test
> experimental again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> ---
> src/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/src/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 98123f1..e8ae9b0 100644
> --- a/src/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/src/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -703,6 +703,6 @@ static fwts_framework_ops cpufreq_ops = {
> .minor_tests = cpufreq_tests
> };
>
> -FWTS_REGISTER(cpufreq, &cpufreq_ops, FWTS_TEST_ANYTIME, FWTS_FLAG_BATCH_EXPERIMENTAL | FWTS_FLAG_ROOT_PRIV);
> +FWTS_REGISTER(cpufreq, &cpufreq_ops, FWTS_TEST_ANYTIME, FWTS_FLAG_BATCH | FWTS_FLAG_ROOT_PRIV);
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.8.0
>
Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin <kengyu at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list