[PATCH] data: cater for _PTS not existing

[Keng-Yu Lin]

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Colin King <colin.king at canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Sometimes _PTS is not implemented and the kernel complains.  It appears
> it is a control that helps the firmware do housekeeping before suspend
> and for some firmware it is not implemented because it does not need
> _PTS. Cater for this by adding some suitable advice and marking this
> as not a high level error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> ---
>  data/klog.json | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/data/klog.json b/data/klog.json
> index 2847ce0..7c99c03 100644
> --- a/data/klog.json
> +++ b/data/klog.json
> @@ -2796,6 +2796,14 @@
>    },
>    {
>     "compare_mode": "regex",
> +   "log_level": "LOG_LEVEL_INFO",
> +   "tag": "FWTS_TAG_ACPI_PARSE_EXEC_FAIL",
> +   "pattern": "ACPI Error.*Method (execution|parse\/execution) failed.*_PTS.*AE_NOT_EXIST",
> +   "advice": "The kernel has attempted to execute the _PTS (Prepare to Suspend) control but it has not been implemented on this platform.  Section 6.1 of the ACPI specification states: 'The _PTS control method provides the BIOS a mechanism for performing some housekeeping, such as writing the sleep type value to the embedded controller, before entering the system sleeping state'.  Hence _PTS is provided for the firmware to do housekeeping and therefore does not appear to be mandatory.  In this case, the platform seems to have omitted _PTS because it may not need it.  Unfortunately the kernel complains about this not existing. This is most probably not an error.",
> +   "label": "KlogAcpiObjectDoesNotExist"
> +  },
> +  {
> +   "compare_mode": "regex",
>     "log_level": "LOG_LEVEL_HIGH",
>     "tag": "FWTS_TAG_ACPI_PARSE_EXEC_FAIL",
>     "pattern": "ACPI Error.*Method (execution|parse\/execution) failed.*AE_NOT_EXIST",
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
Acked-by: Keng-Yu Lin <kengyu at canonical.com>