Internal error in syntaxcheck test

Colin Ian King colin.king at canonical.com
Wed Oct 5 19:02:16 UTC 2016


On 05/10/16 20:00, Al Stone wrote:
> On 10/05/2016 12:56 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> On 05/10/16 19:54, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>>> I'm encountering an odd error in the syntaxcheck test, and I'm trying to
>>> debug why.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> An example instance of the error I get:
>>>
>>> FAILED [HIGH] AMLAsmASL_MSG_CONSTANT_EVALUATION: Test 1, Assembler error
>>> in line
>>> 6136
>>> Line | AML source
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> 06133|                     If (LNotEqual (ToInteger (Local0), 0x00))
>>> 06134|                     {
>>> 06135|                         ShiftLeft (Local0, 0x04, Local0)
>>> 06136|                         Store (Concatenate (Concatenate
>>> (Concatenate ("USB[", "0"), "]: Fused Value for TUNE2: "), ToHexString
>>> (Local0)
>>>      |          ^
>>>      | Error 6014: Could not evaluate constant expression    (AE_NO_MEMORY)
>>> 06137|                             ), Debug)
>>> 06138|                     }
>>> 06139|                     Else
>>> ================================================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> ADVICE: (for Error #6014, ASL_MSG_CONSTANT_EVALUATION): Failed to
>>> evaluate a
>>> constant expression, the compiler could not resolve a subtree for some
>>> unknown
>>> reason.
>>>
>>> I may be wrong, but this reads like some kind of internal error in the
>>> test, rather than an issue with the DSDT table.
>>>
>>> The only odd thing is that for some reason, the disassembly split the
>>> source line into two - 06137, above, is really a continuation of 06136.
>>>
>>> Manually disassemblying my compiled source with iasl -d, I see the same
>>> odd split, but recompiling the disasembled source with iasl does not
>>> generate any errors.
>>>
>>> I first see these errors with tag V16.05.00.  I did a git bisect between
>>> V16.03.00 and V16.05.00, which pointed me at:
>>>
>>> commit 9cbc043fcc51d7de6dd8bc1680414a6248ad6cc6
>>> Author: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>>> Date:   Fri Mar 18 23:58:30 2016 +0000
>>>
>>>     ACPICA: Update to version 20160318 (LP: #1559312)
>>>
>>>     Changes in this release of ACPICA are detailed at the following
>>>     link on the ACPICA developer mailing list:
>>>
>>>     https://lists.acpica.org/pipermail/devel/2016-March/000894.html
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>>>     Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
>>>     Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu at canonical.com>
>>>
>>> Is there some weird interaction between how FWTS runs syntaxcheck and
>>> current versions of ACPICA?
>>>
>> It may be an interaction issue; the interfaces between FWTS and ACPICA
>> may be buggy. Do you have the table available so I can debug this?
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
> 
> Off hand, I'm more inclined to believe ACPICA is the issue; the most
> recent versions have been fiddling around with expressions and their
> syntax a great deal, so something might be off in the way the expression
> is being evaluated.
> 
Well, if I can get my hands on the table I can bisect down the code in
ACPICA and validate that assertion :-)

Colin



More information about the fwts-devel mailing list