juju-core-1.11.2.tar.gz is available now

[David Cheney]

I just guessed. I will adopt your scheme from now on. I'll propose a
branch that fixes the build script.

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, James Page <james.page at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 11/07/13 03:34, David Cheney wrote:
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> I've built a tarball from the 1.11.2 release (the code for building
>> the tarball is in juju-core/scripts/build-release-tarball), it's
>> operationally identical to what mgz did for 1.10. Do you want to take
>> a stab at feeding it to saucy ?
>
>
> Well almost:
>
> 1) the naming approach for the tarball changed a bit
>
>  juju-core_1.10.0.1.tar.gz -> juju-core-1.11.2.tar.gz
>
> Note the change in use of underscore.  This is fixable but I need to know
> which you intend to use going forwards.
>
> 2) the structure is different; in the 1.10.0.1 tarball all the code was
> placed under 'src' - its now all in the top-level directory.
>
> Again I can fix this in packaging; but I need consistency!
>
>
>> Related: I'd like to offer to adopt and integrate the packaging for
>> juju-core into the source of juju-core, or at least so it is handled
>> by the build-release-tarball script. Does that sound like a good idea
>> ?
>
>
> Maybe - lemme think about it.
>
>
> --
> James Page
> Technical Lead
> Ubuntu Server Team
> james.page at canonical.com