Landing bot currently down
Gustavo Niemeyer
gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com
Fri Jul 26 14:05:51 UTC 2013
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Martin Packman
<martin.packman at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 26/07/2013, Gustavo Niemeyer <gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Since you have to recreate it either way, might be worth using juju
>> this time around.
>
> It used juju, that's the issue. The tarmac charm didn't do quite what
> we needed, so it had to get some manual poking after the fact. Part of
> the issue with just fixing the charm was it's puppet based, and never
> made it into the maintained set of charms we offer.
So it used a charm, but it was manually hacked after the fact? If
that's the case, that still looks like an opportunity to fix the
charm, and I'd disagree that "using juju" was the issue.
gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list