More failing tests...

[David Cheney]

Sounds reasonable and workable.

/me continues to volunteer to setup this sort of build automation.

On 01/03/13 01:53, Gavin Panella wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 13:04, William Reade <william.reade at canonical.com> wrote:
>> The only issue is that... intermittent failures still happen, and *they*
>> will mess with tarmac. Right? Would someone with experience chime here?
>
> Tarmac communicates by commenting on the merge proposal (and then
> Launchpad emails people). When a test run fails it adds a comment and
> changes the proposal back to "Needs Review".
>