Breaking schema changes

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:07 PM, David Cheney
<david.cheney at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Mark Canonical Ramm-Christensen
> <mark.ramm-christensen at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Mostly, it is to combat the perception that we are making breaking changes
>> at a rapid pace, and therefore aren't stable enough for real world use.
>>
>
> Understood, although I repeat my assertion that we should do several major
> upgrade actions (even if they do not consitute a visible major upgrade from
> a numeric point of view) to iron out the process.

While getting reading for the first actual major version, you can
tweak the logic so it exercises the major version upgrade path on
every in-development patch version.


gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net