Scale Testing: Now with profiling!

[John Meinel]

I have the patch up for review, and it doesnt really break compatibility.
If you want to change how we salt things we can, but it would mean changing
what is written to the DB. I suppose the new form of the hash could be
salt:hash or something.

John
=:->
On Nov 4, 2013 5:26 PM, "William Reade" <william.reade at canonical.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:39 PM, roger peppe <rogpeppe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The changes look trivial, although we'd have to be careful if we wanted to
>> maintain backward compatibility.
>>
>
> If we're going to fix this (which ISTM we should) we should make sure we
> fix the salting at the same time: there's no sense incurring compatibility
> costs in the same area more than once.
>
> A little part of me wants to use this as an excuse to use SSL client
> certificates for agents instead, but I'm not sure it's really justifiable
> here.
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Juju-dev mailing list
>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20131104/5b7854b6/attachment.html>