Focus for the next three weeks
David Cheney
david.cheney at canonical.com
Tue Sep 10 04:13:54 UTC 2013
Sorry to add more wood to the pile, but 1.14.0 needs to go out, basically now.
https://launchpad.net/juju-core/+milestone/1.14.0
Shows three issues (one is merged on trunk, but needs backporting)
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Lets start with the target: we have Saucy being released next month, and
> we want to get a rocking release done for that.
>
> Working backwards, and giving ourselves a week slack (which we will end
> up needing) before final freeze, takes us roughly to the end of September.
>
> I'd like to see where we are on our targets, and work out what we can
> get done in the next three weeks that makes as many people happy as
> possible.
>
> 1. MAAS Tag support
>
> This seems to be a key need for a number of engagements we have, and
> also a reason why some MAAS/Juju demos are still using pyJuju. We have
> talked about this a lot, but I haven't seen any other movement or
> progress on it.
>
> What is the current state of play with the provider or cloud specific
> constraints? Does anyone see real blockers to having MAAS tag
> deployment constraints done in the next three weeks? Who is going to be
> the lead on this? William?
>
> 2. Container Pain
>
> Right now we don't have a way to restrict the users creating containers
> that they cannot address. I propose that we add a method to the
> environment interface that is SupportsContainers() bool. This can then
> be used to stop people at least creating containers that they can't use.
>
> This I think we need to do in the next three weeks, and make sure the
> add-machine and deployment commands respect whether containers are
> supported or not. Currently the only provider that actually supports
> containers is MAAS.
>
> Next I think we should have SupportedContainers() on a machine.
> Different machines can support different containers. However I'm not
> sure we should do this in the next three weeks, so will be the focus of
> a different email.
>
> 3. API only non-bootstrap agents
>
> How close are we on this one? I know we have been making good progress,
> but what is the likelihood of this being done in the next three weeks?
>
> 4. Manual provisioning, Manual bootstrap, Null provider
>
> I think we are making good progress on this, and should have this in.
>
> 5. KVM containers
>
> I have some work done by Robie Basak that provides us with some command
> line tools for having images available, and starting/stopping and
> listing kvm containers. This needs someone on it, possibly me, to take
> it further. Based on the newness of the tools, I have about a 50%
> confidence rating on this right now.
>
> 6. Container addressability for EC2 / Openstack
>
> I don't know where this is at right now. Can Martin please fill us in.
>
> 7. Simplestream tools
>
> I talked with Ian earlier and he thinks there is about another week of
> work to polish this up and add documentation. This will really help the
> use of Juju in private clouds, or non-certified public clouds.
>
>
> 8. What else do we have that is new or note worthy that we are working
> on in the next three weeks?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list