Landing bot restrictions

Curtis Hovey-Canonical curtis at canonical.com
Tue Aug 19 13:20:37 UTC 2014


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Menno Smits <menno.smits at canonical.com> wrote:
> Be aware that I've seen JFDI used at least a couple of times over recent
> weeks on PRs that *were* related to fixing a CI blocker but the person was
> in too much of a hurry to add the appropriate __fixes-NNNNN__ comment. That
> accounts for at least some of the JFDI usage (but certainly not all of it).
>
> At any rate, we should surely be preferring the "fixes" comment over "JFDI"
> whenever a PR is related to a CI blocker fix.

I have seen this too. It didn't bother since it there was a battle
going on between me, github and the mergebot about syntax. One day the
merge will also update the bug status. At that point we will al care
that the bug identifies the bug that we want marked fix-committed.



-- 
Curtis Hovey
Canonical Cloud Development and Operations
http://launchpad.net/~sinzui



More information about the Juju-dev mailing list