reviewboard-github integration

Michael Foord michael.foord at canonical.com
Tue Oct 21 09:40:45 UTC 2014


On 20/10/14 22:38, Eric Snow wrote:
> This should be resolved now.  I've verified it works for me.  If it
> still impacts anyone, just let me know.

I still have the issue I'm afraid. No reviewer set, no diff.

http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/211/

Michael

>
> -eric
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Eric Snow <eric.snow at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, this is the same issue that Ian brought up.  I'm looking into
>> it.  Sorry for the pain.
>>
>> -eric
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dimiter Naydenov
>> <dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hey Eric,
>>>
>>> Today I tried proposing a PR and the RB issue (#202) was created, but
>>> it didn't have "Reviewers" field set (as described below), it wasn't
>>> published (due to the former), but MOST importantly didn't have a diff
>>> uploaded. After fiddling around with rbt I managed to do:
>>> $ rbt diff > ~/patch
>>> (while on the proposed feature branch)
>>>
>>> And then went to the RB issue page and manually uploaded the generated
>>> diff and published it.
>>>
>>> So most definitely the hook generating RB issues have to upload the
>>> diff as well :)
>>>
>>> It's coming together, keep up the good work!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dimiter
>>>
>>> On 20.10.2014 16:53, Eric Snow wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Ian Booth
>>>> <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey Eric
>>>>>
>>>>> This is awesome, thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did run into a gotcha - I created a PR and then looked at the
>>>>> Incoming review queue and there was nothing new there. I then
>>>>> clicked on All in the Outgoing review queue and saw that the
>>>>> review was unpublished. I then went to publish it and it
>>>>> complained at least one reviewer was needed. So I had to fill in
>>>>> "juju-team" and all was good.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Can we make it so that the review is published automatically?
>>>>> 2. Can we pre-fill "juju-team" as the reviewer?
>>>> Good catch.  The two are actually related.  The review is
>>>> published, but that fails because no reviewer got set.  I'll get
>>>> that fixed.
>>>>
>>>> -eric
>>>>
>>>
>>> - --
>>> Dimiter Naydenov <dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com>
>>> juju-core team
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJURSrnAAoJENzxV2TbLzHw0BQH/16P4qPDI28kkGs398qRKY5s
>>> eUtcHBpYs+JuLV2ZA0LjCpTds89RBDW6cKsxcfXxaAmawIb0KHh920VzKb1Wl2OT
>>> z/iMOF2q91LnV58dqPf7mZjHaT1LPRdSRxg6aAZW/mjexwVRtRDT4Asd5w6JpKrH
>>> 9Tkqfy86OilJ70X8qNbegvjJrBAttwoLLI4jwJq4dNWUbWCBbuumryh0k6+GlmNH
>>> NiKbpi45pPy/RIFVA7ewbLIOpUXleHm5NIGlA/liZOMHpz0w5QHK3FYGLuGMNzQC
>>> fq4qW6rfb1ITdr7XWsA3gooV6FUndw3mbNsod3QgSv82RDA6GGECHeYimGG94/g=
>>> =POJ4
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>> --
>>> Juju-dev mailing list
>>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev




More information about the Juju-dev mailing list