Is ReviewBoard a good thing?
Dimiter Naydenov
dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com
Fri Sep 19 13:55:34 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19.09.2014 16:44, Richard Harding wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Nate Finch wrote:
>
>> There's one thing that hasn't been mentioned - reviewboard gives
>> us a unified review queue.
>
> Can I ask how kanban doesn't do this job for you? I've heard this
> said a couple of times but I realized the way I find out what needs
> to be looked at is to go to kanban not github. I do that for the
> same reason. We've got teams working on 4 different github projects
> under two different orgs at the moment. Using the source control as
> a source seems pretty doomed. You already have a 3rd party tool to
> track that, kanban.
+1, In addition you can always check
https://github.com/juju/juju/pulls to see what's in the queue. For
sub-repositories it's the same, like
https://github.com/juju/names/pulls. While I agree it's not all in one
place, I tend to work on the main repo mostly, and alternatively you
can check the Notifications page (https://github.com/notifications) to
see all activity.
Dimiter
>
> Rick
>
- --
Dimiter Naydenov <dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com>
juju-core team
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUHDXWAAoJENzxV2TbLzHwV68H/1kJfNtOvaPSeKIc9DheDmUr
ainEU/blIbY4CQe04lybX6vVoK+KZaFwddoeFa17rou7ReDckp3S4yBTZXcD0KO0
QvwYbuqnepWi9pKN3dcuJftknaEE9vLqslWzjTFyZmjS96RGXT3WlR/CrCCZnjUw
Yr7K33ytjcr0oBo8bEk0G0wOkQvwVuvlnNLPPaZF681QyqvODRD+jmgs7SGeUuJu
GS6vLzIppd6xJQiDy72slcLdAcMyPkqCm2jOTosy5ZSMDKHjxgIP0s9uaHmTIJO2
BdZxik0TZfsA7r+DRwhQndvKdmklmcLUQAxp5+oY/nPyGe0s5lZ9PC37p+BtrD8=
=L6g5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list