"unfairness" of juju/mutex
Adam Collard
adam.collard at canonical.com
Thu Nov 17 12:01:18 UTC 2016
FWIW this is being tracked in https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1642541
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 04:17 Nate Finch <nate.finch at canonical.com> wrote:
> Just for historical reference. The original implementation of the new OS
> mutex used flock until Dave mentioned that it presented problems with file
> management (files getting renamed, deleted, etc).
>
> In general, I'm definitely on the side of using flock, though I don't
> think that necessarily solves our starvation problem, it depends on how
> flock is implemented and the specific behavior of our units.
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20161117/b29c9725/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list