Github Reviews vs Reviewboard

[roger peppe]

On 24 October 2016 at 22:22, Menno Smits <menno.smits at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 25 October 2016 at 10:17, Horacio Duran <horacio.duran at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't we leave it for historic purposes?
>>
>
> Will it really get used? My bet is that the project's commit history will be
> enough.

I think that review history is crucial for context on historic
code decisions - I often look into a review to see why a
particular piece of code is the way it is (including old
Juju codereview reviews).

It would be unfortunate to lose them in my view.

  cheers,
    rog.