Timeout added to kill-controller

[Stuart Bishop]

On 27 September 2016 at 18:14, John Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:

> At one point we discussed that "kill-controller" should always be strictly
> "--with-fire" while "destroy-controller" would do the safe cleanup. That
> allows you to have a "make sure it is all dead" but not give people a false
> sense of security that they can just run it always. --with-fire is going to
> be inherently risky once you have multiple credentials. Because at that
> point, your current credentials cannot list all of the possible instances
> that are running everywhere.
>

I don't think having subtle differences like that is good for end users. I
know I'm often entering several commands trying to guess which
kill/destroy/remove/delete verb I should be using for this product this
week.  You will never be consistent with every other product, so there will
always be confusion.


-- 
Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20160927/c495188d/attachment.html>