Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp

[Cory Johns]

I'm also +1 on a timestamp.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Jason Hobbs <jason.hobbs at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts
> <merlijn.sebrechts at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel
> > <john.meinel at canonical.com>:
> >>
> >> I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug:
> >>   https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963
> >>
> >> And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have
> >> some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between
> each
> >> "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like
> something
> >> that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else
> would
> >> always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you
> could
> >> correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.)
> >>
> >> Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it
> >> does/doesn't belong?
> >>
> >> John
> >> =:->
> >>
> >> --
> >> Juju-dev mailing list
> >> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
> >
> >
> > --
> > Juju-dev mailing list
> > Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
> >
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20180418/8f9e8800/attachment.html>