juju for testing purposes

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

> We've talked about having a restful interface on every node, which would
> allow for direct inspection and manipulation of juju properties for that
> node.

Indeed, except s/on every node/for every node/. It'll be a single
interface, that enables tweaking any of the nodes.

> It might be interesting to enable charms to expose restful elements in
> the tree, so to speak. That would mean that something the charm provides
> could respond to an HTTP query. In Marc's case, that could be the rest
> results, or a status message saying they were not ready yet.

When we do get to the REST interface, we'll also support configuration
changes through it, which is effectively a channel of communication
with the charm itself as you describe.

-- 
Gustavo Niemeyer
http://niemeyer.net
http://niemeyer.net/plus
http://niemeyer.net/twitter
http://niemeyer.net/blog

-- I'm not absolutely sure of anything.