Finishing off the "unprovider" aka. "ssh provider"

[Jorge O. Castro]

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Marcos Barbosa
<marcosestevesbarbosa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Exist "ec2", "local", etc. May be
> "ssh" or "single" be a good idea. The user set environment.yaml with user,
> password or may be the path do ssh key and the system do the others tasks.

This is a good point. We have an open bug (which I can't find right
now) which is basically "we should include a well documented
environments.yaml file" which will have all the providers there, you'd
just need to uncomment out the ones you need.