PPAs for juju api client and deployer

[David Cheney]

I don't care. We have ~juju/stable but it is empty. I'm happy (more
than happy, ecstatic might be the word) for someone else to make this
decision.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ceppi at canonical.com> wrote:
> I guess that was my question. I'd really like to simplify the user
> experience when installing and managing Juju tools, having all the
> additional tools like deployer, charm-tools, amulet, etc in one place would
> be a nice step forward. I've just used ppa:juju/pkgs as it was the canonical
> ppa for juju packages back in the pyjuju days. Ultimately, deciding where
> these tools should live, using that ppa, then documenting it for users in my
> opinion is the way to go. So whether that ppa is juju/pkgs or a new one like
> juju/tools is fine, I think we just need to decide.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Andreas Hasenack <andreas at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ceppi at canonical.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andreas!
>>>
>>> Thanks for getting this packaged! I wonder in general though, would it be
>>> better to place it in ppa:juju/pkgs to avoid having to add too many ppas to
>>> peoples machines?
>>>
>>
>> Maybe, I don't know. It's trivial to change the target PPA in the recipe.
>>
>> Isn't ppa:juju/pkgs the old python juju ppa?
>>
>> launchpad.net/~juju has many PPAs, are all current or should some be
>> deprecated?
>
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>