A great example of a high quality charm submission

[Antonio Rosales]

On Tuesday, April 15, 2014, Charles Butler <charles.butler at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Greetings charmers!
>
> As some of you may have experienced a lengthy back and forth during the
> review cycle, I'd like to highlight a high quality charm submission that
> really resonated with me.
>
> The review process was extensive, and my delta on comments was really just
> a knitpick. Have a look at the newly promulgated tomcat charm:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1295710
>
> The components of this charm that really resonated with me during the
> review process:
>
>
>    - Its got a very thorough README that covers the charm in great detail
>    - *It contains tests!!*
>    - Its opinionated
>    - Its flexible (allows for tomcat6, or tomcat7 deployments, and adapts
>    respectively in its opinionated tuning)
>    - Its easy to follow the hook source as to what its doing
>
> I encourage new charm writers to take a look at this charm, and ingest
> what the author Matt Bruzek did when writing this charm. Its a great
> example of a high quality submission. I hope this helps others that are
> just starting to toe the waters of writing a Juju Charm.
>

+1 and all Java programmers rejoice and take a look at this rich charm!

Thanks for the work on it Matt!

-Antonio


>
> Thanks for you time, and all the best.
>
> Charles
>


-- 
-Thanks
Antonio
(mobile)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20140415/19ff4aee/attachment.html>