Failing to start hadoop unit on local with juju

[José Antonio Rey]

Maybe you haven't destroyed your environment and re-bootstrapped?

On 04/27/2014 03:55 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:50 PM, John Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com
> <mailto:john at arbash-meinel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     The peergrouper thing is a non fatal problem with the local provider
>     (it is only used for HA which is currently disabled for local). The
>     problem with default series is the local provider defaults to only
>     making tools for your host available (trusty). Which is why you
>     specify the extra tools series to bootstrap.
> 
> 
> OK. So not sure why it is still showing pending for the hadoop units
> $ juju status
> environment: local
> machines:
>   "0":
>     agent-state: started
>     agent-version: 1.19.1.1
>     dns-name: localhost
>     instance-id: localhost
>     series: trusty
>     state-server-member-status: has-vote
>   "1":
>     instance-id: pending
>     series: precise
>   "2":
>     instance-id: pending
>     series: precise
> services:
>   hadoop-master:
>     charm: cs:precise/hadoop-10
>     exposed: false
>     units:
>       hadoop-master/0:
>         agent-state: pending
>         machine: "1"
>   hadoop-slave:
>     charm: cs:precise/hadoop-10
>     exposed: false
>     units:
>       hadoop-slave/0:
>         agent-state: pending
>         machine: "2"
> 
> I ran
> 
> $ juju deploy hadoop hadoop-master
> $ juju deploy hadoop hadoop-slave
> 
> Once they show started instead of pending, I will add the namenode and
> datanode relations.
> Also will add the jobtracker and tasktracker relations. 
> 
>     John
>     =:->
> 
>     On Apr 27, 2014 1:38 PM, "Asif Iqbal" <vadud3 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:vadud3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>         On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:36 PM, José Antonio Rey
>         <jose at ubuntu.com <mailto:jose at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
> 
>             Was it like that before you bootstrapped?
> 
> 
>         yes
> 
> 
> 
>         -- 
>         Asif Iqbal
>         PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu>
>         A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
>         text.
>         Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> 

-- 
José Antonio Rey