JuJu, LXC, OpenStack charm problem w/Nova & Quantum
Tim Penhey
tim.penhey at canonical.com
Mon Mar 17 19:37:47 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18/03/14 05:35, Matt Rae wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:04 AM, James Page <james.page at ubuntu.com
>> It would be interesting to know what are the blockers for this to
>> work. Using the local provider has been very convenient and it
>> would be nice to be able to deploy openstack without maas.
>
> Would switching to nova-network be a workaround for neutron? Could
> nova-compute use the virt-type="lxc" to get around the hypervisor
> issues?
Just idly wondering, but what are the minimum kvm requirements for
nova-compute and quantum-gateway?
Currently the juju local provider has just one container factory (used
for creating machines). It is just a simple manner of code to make it
work with both kvm and lxc. Did you realize that you can use the
local provider configured to use kvm containers?
Now I've not put too much thought into this yet, and we don't have any
time before 14.04, but could be an interesting spike to show something
off at ODS.
We could have some bundle that described an openstack local deployment
where you could go 'juju quickstart local-openstack' and have a
complete openstack deployment on your laptop in a combination of lxc
and kvm containers.
Thoughts?
Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMnTwgACgkQd1fvI4G7WRDZfwCff5v3y1hfu7L3vYNpS6/VaCN3
mlcAoImQyP2F04Ne20UGYyhhFqHJilgh
=U0oL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Juju
mailing list