disabling upgrades on new machines by default?

[José Antonio Rey]

I believe that, as Jorge mentioned, most users do value having everything
up to date by default, specially when they may go directly to production
environments. Devs may also want to use this switch, as it will save time
during the deployment for testing the charms they have developed.

I believe that turning on upgrades as a default would be more valued by
end-users, but that's just a personal opinion.

--
José Antonio Rey
On Oct 1, 2014 2:34 PM, "Jorge O. Castro" <jorge at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
> <kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:
> > juju can save minutes per machine (especially against release images) if
> we
> > turn off upgrades by default.
>
> There are some updates coming to how we build cloud images that might
> be relevant to this discussion:
> http://blog.utlemming.org/2014/08/archive-triggered-cloud-image-builds.html
>
> IMO safer and slower makes sense for most people, those of us who need
> speed for demos/conferences will know about this switch.
>
> --
> Jorge Castro
> Canonical Ltd.
> http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20141001/d16f5de0/attachment.html>