Tags for charms and bundles

[Joshua Strobl]

Hey Jorge,


I think the initial set of tags you defined is a great start and I'm all for renaming categories to tags, though
I think application_development should just be called development.


Given the Juju GUI has a dropdown that is oriented towards "categories" and would most likely be unwieldy as the
number of tags grows, are there any plans to remove it and**  offer the ability to define tags within the
"Search for Charms" input box in a syntax like:


     tags: backup, storage


- Josh


On 10/07/2014 01:18 PM, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been working with the design team on how we can improve what are
> currently called categories. We'd like to propose the following things
> as new charm policy:
>
> - Rename categories to tags
> - Add a "description" field to bundles, the same as charms.
> - Add an icon to bundles so people can optionally brand their bundles.
> - Add these as a initial set of tags for charms promoted as reviewed:
>
> analytics
> big_data
> ecommerce
> openstack
> cloudfoundry
> cms
> social
> streaming
> wiki
> ops
> backup
> identity
> monitoring
> performance
> audits
> security
> network
> storage
> database
> cache (or cache-proxy?)
> application_development (rails, django, etc.)
> web_server
>
> In a couple of months we will have the ability to let people tag
> however they want for their personal namespace, so we're not trying to
> make a huge tag cloud here, just cover the majority of use cases.
> Thoughts?
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20141007/bd755ca6/attachment.html>