Charm store maintainership access for online services charmers

[Mark Shuttleworth]

On 29/10/14 04:47, Chris Glass wrote:
> I think it makes a lot of sense to let people (or teams) who are
> particularly interested in a specific set of charms to become "real"
> maintainers, as is done for Ubuntu packages.

Agreed; the pattern is to identify teams and then give them rights for
coherent groups of packages / charms which they can drive to achieve
their goals.

One heads-up, we should allow overlap between those teams in cases, and
expect good collaboration around shared parts. For example, things like
identity will be common to many stories, and there may thus be several
teams that can write to those charms, we expect them to be good citizens
when that's the case.

Mark